Almost Imperfect: Moved to recaptured.in

Advertising, Marketing, Strategy and Photography

Saturday, 6 September 2008

Chrome: is it... worth it?

So Chrome is out. Wonderful. Is it good? Or is it like the others in the market?

To find out I tried a very simple (some might say simplistic) test to see if I'd like to shift to Chrome.

I am most concerned with memory usage and stability in all my applications, and since the browser is the one software I use the most, well, I'd like to test this new kid on those two counts.

And if you remember that I was dissatisfied with Firefox 3, I have been on the lookout.

So here we go.
Methodology:
check memory usage
a. of each of the following browsers: Microsoft's IE7, Mozilla's Firefox2 (I had FF2 only, remember FF3 crashes so often on my machine, Mozilla would sue me for this post :D), Apple's Safari, Opera and Google's Chrome.
b. with 1, 2, 3 and 4 tabs open
c. comments about observation and usage etc.


So here are the stats:

One window: facebook.com (my profile page)
IE7 - 206kB
Firefox2 - 92kB
Safari - 107kB
Opera - 53kB
Chrome - 38kB

Two windows: facebook.com (my profile page), flickr.com
IE7 - crashed!
Firefox2 - 81kB!
Safari - 116kB
Opera - 67kB
Chrome - 38kB + 21kB

Three windows: facebook.com (my profile page), flickr.com, gmail.com
Firefox2 - 101kB
Safari - 148kB
Opera - 68kB
Chrome - 38kB+21kB+16kB

Four windows: facebook.com (my profile page), flickr.com, gmail.com, xkcd.com
Firefox2 - 105kB
Safari - 153kB
Opera - 93kB
Chrome - 38kB+21kB+16kB+36kB


So? Do you want charts for me to tell you which is better? Well, if you don't consider Chrome right away, Opera was the lightest browser around, but I don't know why, to me it always seemed to be heavy.

Now what's unique about Chrome is that every tab comes up as a separate process, though on the taskbar it's only one icon. What it means is that if one of your tabs is not responding, then only that tab needs to be shut down, not the whole browser. So even though with a high number of tabs (over 3 on average) Chrome has higher memory usage than other browsers, what would you do with slightly lower usage for statistical purposes if for one malicious tab your entire "slightly lower memory usage" browser goes down? Atleast Chrome is better on that count. And if you want to just check your mail and facebook updates, you won't have to block some 100 kilos of memory.

Touch and feel:
I agree to the Google Chrome comic when it says that the browser needs to get out of the way (and in my opinion, so should the Operating System) when the user is working. Chrome works well on those counts.
More screen space - good.
No status bar - but its functionality is there - with temporary status boxes which appear on a need basis.
No menu bar - but there are two buttons which club all the functionality of the menus. Smart thinking - it's a browser, not an illustration package where you need detailed menus to list out everything.
The favourite/bookmark bar is also not there - bookmarks appear when you open a new tab, which also shows an Opera like, but dynamic dial-space listing out the most visited/last visited pages. Ofcourse if you want an always-visible bookmark bar, press Ctrl+B.

The browser feels nimble and light. The clicks are quick, actions are taken instantly. I like it.

Stability:
On my machine, where FF3 crashed everytime the population of the world hit a multiple of 3, and FF2 and Safari also would go for a toss every couple of hours (let's not talk about IE at all shall we, after seeing the "test results"), Chrome has not crashed ONE SINGLE TIME so far - 5 days, and not even a tab has crashed. Rock solid so far.

Cons:
I've heard about search issues, but I've not needed that functionality so far, so can't comment. But yesterday when I was browsing techmech.wordpress.com/, I realised that the browser window did not have a scroll bar, the wheel did not word, even the up & down arrow keys did not work.Well, the content did flow beyond the first fold, because when I clicked in the window and dragged down, the content did slide up. I'm sure this is a minor bug, which should be rectified soon, if brought to Google's notice.

Hypnos verdict:
Lighter than others. Stabler than others. I've faced a slight glitch, but I think I can live with that right now, given that I'm living a more peaceful life due to the two big plus points I already mentioned.

Labels: , , , , ,

1 Comments:

  • At 3 October 2008 at 05:31 , Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Chrome is not the only browser with one process per tab. It was actually Microsoft's IE8 beta 2 that was launched onw week before chrome that had it first. IE8 has it for tab recovery.
    In none of your statistics do you quote IE8 although you do talk about chrome which is also a "beta"
    Comparing IE7 with FF3 and chrome is absurd since it is much older technology.

     

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home